NOTE: I am neither Malaysian nor Australian, but was shocked by even just the idea of the Malaysian Solution. If you feel like I have misunderstood Malaysian or Australian contexts, please do not hesitate to add your thoughts in the comments!
For those of you who don’t already know about the Malaysian Solution, it’s a plan between the Malaysian and Australian governments (under Najib Razak and Julia Gillard respectively) to have a sort of refugee swap deal. Under this “solution”, Australia will send 800 boatpeople to Malaysia in exchange for 4000 registered refugees from Malaysia. It’s a way for Australia to offload the large numbers of unprocessed asylum seekers that arrive on its shores, and for Malaysia to get rid of refugees. In terms of the numbers game, it seems like an okay idea.
Except that Malaysia hasn’t ratified the UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which means that the rights of refugees aren’t guaranteed in Malaysia. It is not just possible, but also likely, that unregistered refugees will be treated as illegal immigrants, for whom the punishments can range from fines and prison time all the way up to mandatory caning. In fact, my friend Soon Chen has just written a piece for SEA Youth Say So on this very issue (related to yet another swap deal that Malaysia is trying to pursue with Burma). In the light of this fact, isn’t Australia just sending boatpeople to Malaysia to get ill-treated?
Read more